US presidential elections involve a fabulous expense of time, effort and money. Doubtless it is all too much – but, by the end, nobody can complain that the candidates have been too little scrutinised. We have learnt a lot about Barack Obama and John McCain during this campaign. In our view, it is enough to be confident that Mr Obama is the right choice.
Mr Obama fought a much better campaign. Campaigning is not the same as governing, and the presidency should not be a prize for giving the best speeches. Nonetheless, a campaign is a test of leadership. Mr Obama ran his superbly; Mr McCain’s has looked a shambles. After eight years of George W. Bush, the steady competence of the Obama operation commands respect.
Nor should one disdain Mr Obama’s way with a crowd. Good presidents engage the country’s attention; great ones inspire. Mr McCain is an adequate speaker. Mr Obama is as fine a political orator as the country has heard in decades. Put to the right purposes, this is no mere decoration but a priceless asset.
We applaud his main domestic proposal to achieve nearly universal insurance without the mandates of rival schemes: it combines a far-sighted goal with moderation in the method. Mr McCain’s plan, based on extending tax relief beyond employer-provided insurance is too timid and would widen coverage much less.
Rest assured that, should he win, Mr Obama is bound to disappoint. How could he not? He is expected to heal the country’s racial divisions, improve middle-class living standards, cut almost everybody’s taxes, transform the image of the United States abroad, end the losses in Iraq, deal with the mess in Afghanistan and much more besides.
Succeeding in those endeavours would require more than uplifting oratory and presidential deportment even if the economy were growing rapidly, which it will not be.
The challenges facing the next president will be extraordinary. We hesitate to wish it on anyone, but we hope that Mr Obama gets the job.
Monday, October 27, 2008
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
1 comment:
The Financial Times is not an ultra conservative news paper, it s just pro business. If anything it is one of the more socially enlightened newspapers around, certainly beats The NYT for superior reporting, in depth coverage and claiming some of the finest reporters and analysts in the business. World leaders read it and take advise from it any day over NYT.
Post a Comment